Labour’s School Building Scheme ‘Wasted £2.5bn’


The days of swanky new flagship academies operating in “truly world-class” school buildings are over, according to a government review published yesterday.

Instead, the schools of the future will be built to a more standardised design which can be replicated across the country.
The review, headed by Sebastian James – head of group operations at Dixons, says that Labour’s school building programme wasted as much as £2.5bn a year in bureaucracy and design costs – about 30 per cent of the cost of the programme.

The academies project under Tony Blair opened with a fanfare of publicity and designs devised by leading architects such as Norman Foster. However, the review concluded: “There is very little evidence that a school building that goes beyond being fit for purpose has the potential to drive educational transformation.”

Indeed, it adds that some research suggested that pupil performance often “dipped” during and after rebuilding work.

The report also says that – with schools and local authorities negotiating their own building designs with construction firms – there was a lack of expertise which led to increased costs. What was needed was a standard set of designs which could be adapted for projects around the country, backed up with the appointment of a central body to carry out negotiations on cost.

The review was ordered in the wake of the decision by Education Secretary Michael Gove to slash Labour’s school-building programme – under which every school in the country would eventually be rebuilt or refurbished.


Dorothy Smith

With a keyboard for a compass, Dorothy Smith navigates the diverse landscapes of British life. His blog delves into lifestyle trends, cultural gems, home & garden havens, political intrigues, and travel adventures. Buckle up for witty insights and thought-provoking explorations – all served with a distinctly British charm.